Global energy consumption in the last half century has increased very rapidly and is expected to continue to grow over the next 50 years. However, we expect to see significant differences between the last 50 years and the next. The past increase was stimulated by relatively “cheap” fossil fuels and increased rates of industrialization in North America, Europe, and Japan; yet while energy consumption in these countries continues to increase, additional factors are making the picture for the next 50 years more complex. These additional complicating factors include the very rapid increase fuel economy in energy use in China and India (countries representing about a third of the world’s population); the expected depletion of oil resources in the not-too-distant future; and the effect of human activities on global climate change. (more…)

Following the recent completion of three nuclear power plants, there is now some 9.6 GW of nuclear capacity in the United Kingdom. The nuclear share of electrical output, which has stood at around 13% for many years, should rise to around 20% when this capacity is in full operation. A further two reactors are currently under construction which will increase the British nuclear capacity to more than 12 GW by the late 1980s, which could bring the nuclear share of electrical output to around 25%. (more…)

Electric utility deregulation offers the great promise of market forces leading to lower electric rates, lower air pollution environment, greater energy (and economic) efficiency, and perhaps greater use of renewable energy sources. Ideally, deregulation involves the restructuring of a previously monopolized or nationalized electric utility into separate generation, transmission, distribution, and marketing companies, and allowing wholesale and retail choice of generation company or power marketer. Deregulation has occurred to varying degrees since 1989 in the United Kingdom, Norway, Australia, New Zealand, Chile, Argentina, and about 20 states in the United States. There have been promising results in a few countries and in some U.S. states in some respects, especially lower rates and lower air pollution problems. In most cases, competitive markets have yet to be realized and lower rates can be attributed to other causes, such as previously planned amortization or retirement of expensive power plants, unexpected surplus in natural gas, rate caps, etc. In addition, deregulation has had only a slight beneficial effect on the use of renewable electricity sources. The promise of electric utility deregulation is thus unfulfilled and deserves further study.

Geopolitical considerations have played a major role in many renewable energy policy decisions, e.g., in domestic debates over gasoline taxes, pipeline construction, radioactive waste disposal, and acid rain control legislation in the United States, and in petroleumrelated violence in Nigeria. The most prominent role for geopolitics in energy policy has probably involved international discussions on controlling greenhouse gas emissions, and in oil markets. In the cases of the Kyoto Protocol of 1997 and the 1992 Framework Convention on Climate Change, nations carefully considered their national economic interests, domestic politics, and international trade during the negotiations. European countries, with the lowest rates of population and economic growth along with strong domestic environmental lobbies, have pursued a greater rate of greenhouse gas reduction.

The United States, in contrast, has been stubbornly cautious and backed out of the treaty in 2001 (arguing it is not in its economic best interests), and the oil-rich nations of the Middle East have been least supportive of any emissions controls. In the case of oil markets, with the United States now dependent on imports for over half its supply, energy policy and trade strategy have played major roles in the pursuit of new oil discoveries in Alaska and in warfare in Kuwait, Iraq, and perhaps Afghanistan.

Historically, mining companies have extracted the earth’s resources wherever economics made it feasible, secure in their knowledge that their products were essential to society. Prior to the passage of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act in 1977, 1.1 million acres (445,000 ha) of coal-mined land in the United States was left un-reclaimed and over 10,500 miles (16,900 km) of streams and rivers were adversely affected in the Appalachian region alone. Coal mining operations today are designed to comply with environmental regulations and to minimize adverse environmental impacts; exceptions exist, however, and serve to inspire environmental activists and conservation groups to resist and reject mining wherever it is proposed. This societal tension serves as a backdrop to the dynamics of issuing or rejecting mining permit applications. (more…)

Smoke from biomass and coal combustion contains a large number of pollutants with known health hazards, including particulate matter, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur oxides (mainly from coal), formaldehyde, and polycyclic organic compounds (e.g., carcinogens such as benzo[a]pyrene). The concentrations of each of these pollutants vary among the different forms of solid fuels, with animal dung and crop residues having some of the highest level emissions to environment of particulate matter, one of the important indicator pollutants for health effects. (more…)

Currently, site reclamation is planned for during the permitting process and is incorporated into the mining operation. However, this was not always the case. Many mine sites were legally abandoned in an un-reclaimed or poorly reclaimed condition because mining was completed before environmental regulations went into effect. These abandoned mines are scars on the landscape and cause most of the water pollution attributed to mining. These old mines are considered abandoned because, in most countries, no one is legally required to reclaim the land or to treat the water. A similar problem occurs at mine sites that are or were operated by companies that have gone bankrupt. (more…)

<
The operations on-board an oil tanker transportation are radically different from those on other types of ships, primarily due to the physical properties of the cargo. The entire cargo operations are highly automated and proceed with no one on-board the ship or shore seeing the cargo physically. Even minor misunderstanding of an order or a miscalculation can cause a major spill in pristine locations. By the same token, a tanker crewed by properly trained seafarers under good management could very well be the safest ship afloat. Although most tanker voyages today are completed safely and go unreported, even a minor tanker pollution accident often gets widespread attention from the media, and the image of a polluted beach laden with dead flora and fauna is a sad and telling picture. (more…)

Do we have the resources? Rudolf Diesel developed the diesel engine which ran on biodiesel vegetable oil in the late 1800s. At the time, he speculated that his discovery seemed insignificant, but later could prove to be as important as mankind’s uncovering of future energy uses for petroleum and coal tar. Given the U.S.’ rapid expansion into biofuels, it would appear his vision was correct due to the drawbacks of biofuels. But widespread adoption of biomass-based fuels is not a foregone conclusion. Two questions haunt its progress. First, will it truly reduce U.S. reliance on fossil fuels? And second, is there enough farmland to accommodate widespread production, without jeopardizing food supplies? (more…)

The future development of energy crops, to the level at which they would replace residues as the major bioenergy fuel source, will be largely dependent on regional factors such as climate change and local energy requirements and emission factors, which will determine their environmental and financial viability. (more…)

Foundations have made good progress on the energy front, but huge gaps remain. Promising technologies in energy production and use today prove that the prospects for an affluent but low-carbon society are good. But the U.S. and the world economies continue to run primarily on oil and coal. As the largest consumer and producer of energy in the world, the United States has the responsibility to lead the transition to cleaner energy technologies. (more…)